Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26295802-20161221211127/@comment-26347028-20161222113436

Look at it this way; Eureka states that Aramir, exempli gratias, has broken one of these extremely vague rules. So long as there's the slightest of splits, Aramir is banned indefinitely. Is that fair?

As a side note, if you want the rules to cover more things, then add in clauses for what it doesn't cover. But at least recognise the fact that it isn't necessary to completely tear a system apart to change it.