Board Thread:Roleplay Ideas/@comment-26065062-20160713125226/@comment-26453572-20160726154218

Tybereous wrote: The Lord of Minas Morgul wrote:

Tybereous wrote:

The Lord of Minas Morgul wrote: He put Tolkien and his creations in a bad light just because he liked another story better. What's the argument about, which one is better, or why the other one is bad? You put Eragon in a bad light just because you thought LotR is better...

He also didn't say anything about LotR being bad.... 1. I'm not putting it in a bad light (mainly because I haven't read them), I criticized how the author could have chosen better character names (because almost every name is extremely similar to names of Tolkien). Then I corrected Minecraftmage's obviously skewed idea of Tolkien's ideas.

2. The way Chaz speaks makes it sound like Tolkien is a bad author, with poorly ought ot creations, and that the only good thing about his works is that he made his world expansive. 1. As Chaz said, names are almost impossible.

2. It doesn't look like that to me... 1. They're a lot easier than Imiladris and Vanilor.

2. I'm sensing quite a bit of criticism from his statements, not just on his lengthy reply to Pat.