Thread:Aramirtheranger/@comment-26347028-20170113232440/@comment-26347028-20170115135737

Stubbornness is not intolerance. Stubbornness keeps intolerance, perhaps, but it is not intolerance per se.

Martyrdom is not so great as you'd expect, I'm sure. Nothingness is forever worse than life, and if you're right - I don't want your heaven. But if we're both wrong, then the general consensus is we're both going to burn for all eternity. Great.

And, mayhaps I'm talking about all of those that matter.

You refused to accept that feminism wasn't inherently about getting women more rights than men. Time after time, you stated that the "aims of feminism", as you put it, were to create a "female master race".

I find it exceedingly interesting how you proclaim me horrible for doing something I don't particularly recall - perhaps show me where I've done it (?) - and then said something else that is entirely untrue. The implications of the last sentence are massive, it must be said. Women can be as intelligent. Do you even realise what you're saying? You're suggesting that there is a standard set by men that women are able to reach, but don't necessarily reach - and presumably don't by your choice of those specific words. I love how you're only now trying to cover your words, and claim you didn't say any of it, yet digging only a deeper hole - Trump, is what I'd call it.

If you would like it if they change, you wouldn't like it if they didn't. Truism. But no, you'll contradict yourself. Please, be my guest to do so.

And I don't mind the "good" Christians. It's just that if everyone actually followed the Bible, organisations such as the KKK would be far more prevalent. See, that's not evidence of anything. It's only evidence of the failings of Abrahamic religions.

I like your negligence to answer. We disagree on many things, yet we are both human, both entirely sane - although you may not think the same of me - and both presumably intelligent, just you don't seem to have any reasonable amount of skepticism to use as a base.

Ah, bigotry, how you love it. Is it a massive attempt at an insult? Would that not require me trying to insult you? Yet, if I don't treat you with less respect than you deserve, which I don't believe I have, it is no insult.

I would like to believe myself accurate to past events. Accurate it is not to your recollection, but to everything I am aware of, certainly so. If you can point out where I've gone wrong, then go ahead. Feel free. So far, you haven't.

Ah, a "far-leftist whiny millennial". Well, allow me to break this down. I'm centrist, get called far-right by the left, get called far-left by the right. I have extreme views, but they're extreme in that they're extremely centrist, which makes everyone say "far" and then their adjective of choice. The British have a reputation for being whiny, I don't know about overseas, but you certainly have a point. If there's a problem, I don't just ignore it. And I certainly am a millennial, but then again, so is everyone here. What exactly were you trying to suggest?

I call honesty more gracious than silence. It is my belief that with this off my chest, I have nothing to hide, there should be nothing you should know, and you can make up your own opinion about the sadness - or lack of - in my departure.

I do enjoy your paranoia to some extent, it must be said, though sadly it is unfounded.