Thread:Auraestus/@comment-27097330-20160824163647/@comment-26347028-20160827194332

Because apparently the view on disliking change is presumably making you dislike this change, and so you're claiming that since the rest of the rules are "bad" that this is too? Excuse me, but there weren't any rules before this and if you're willing to come up with a better system then I'd like to hear it. But there's one thing I certainly will not accept. And that is lawlessness.

So, when you wrote this, you were saying that since I wrote it it was bad or something similar, because from what you say you dislike it for no apparent reason, state it's just a power grab from me, then claim it's bad for no real reason, and even then you're not done and claim I'm being shrewd and using backdoors and excuses to keep it in. Excuse me, but I fail to see how this bears any relevance at all to the situation beforehand, and even your reasoning for any of this.

You know, someone could really be excused for thinking this was one big personal attack.