Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26295802-20161220024905/@comment-26347028-20161221152349

Patrick.vtap wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

Patrick.vtap wrote:

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

Patrick.vtap wrote:

High Prince Imrahil wrote:

Patrick.vtap wrote: So, in terms of bannable offenses, what are we thinking? An admin can't just decide 'that player's a menace to the wiki' and then BLAM! He's banned. Because the current Admin team is a bit limited and have their own biases, just like any human beings do. So, we need a list of ban-able offenses, how long the ban lasts, and how to decide. Exactly. Our current set of "rules" was thrown together with little-to-no input from the wiki at large. Hence the need to establish a real set of actual laws, not abunch of weird regulations that are only used on either the admins hate that day. So, shall we begin forumulating? How about you consider it as amendments to the Rules, not just rip them apart? So far as I can tell, you don't even know what they entail. Because we need new rules. I wouldn't be against implementing a major part of the rules in the new document, I just think we need something more acessible and that everyone works on and agrees on. Y Therefore rather than ripping a large amount of work up and throwing it to the wind, how about you lot read it and then consider what you want to change. I've read it, and I think we can incorporate a large part of the rules into these new ones. I just think we need soemthing more accessible and that is decided by all of us. If you wish to add the current, existing rules into the new ones, you are welcome to work on the new rules with us. It is very easily accessible. If that's the problem, then solve it. If you want to decide on the issues, decide, and the Rules may be amended. But don't just tear down what works and pretend what you're doing is good.