Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26295802-20160118234935/@comment-26184570-20160119021011

High Prince Imrahil wrote: Argali1 wrote: Tybereous wrote: Argali1 wrote: Tybereous wrote: Argali1 wrote: Tybereous wrote: Argali1 wrote: Tybereous wrote: Argali1 wrote: Tybereous wrote: Argali1 wrote: 1. Cut me out of the list please.

2. This is not important! It's not like Glosur actually led us when he was here! We will be fine without a leader. Besides, no one here has the ability to promote a new person, if Glosur is gone. It's because of arguments. If something comes up, someone needs to be able to deal with it. They don't need to be elected leader! It's not like it would make a difference anyway. If something happens, a more rational person will be able to settle it. Just watch and see, it'll be fine! I highly doubt that. Remember Ed v Heart? Someone needs to be able to step in and say "Shut the f*ck up!" without people saying "Who cares what you say?" and ignoring them. Leave that to the masses. It should be fine. Glosur wasn't even the person to do that when that whole thing happened. IDK. I just think someone should be in authority, even if it is sort of empty.

I propose we wait a week, and if Glosur isn't back by then, whoever wins this poll is the temporary owner. Even so, they wouldn't actually be an owner. If Glosur is gone, they wouldn't be able to become promoted, as there are no bearocrats (forgive my spelling, IDGAF) other than him. They'll just be acting owner. If nothing else, a figurehead. Just in case. Just promote them to Admin if Glosur isn't back. WE WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO! That's what I am saying! Admins can't promote others to admin unless they have additional rank, which only the founder can give, and, as long as he is absent, that's impossible. I've looked through my privileges, and I thought that I could. I don't think so. Let me check. This pyramid is getting pretty darn high.... Yeah. And I justed added to it >:)