Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26295802-20161220024905/@comment-26347028-20161220165948

Aramirtheranger wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

Morgoth the first dark lord wrote: I believe swearing should be allowed but not too much of it.Also you shouldn't be able to say heavy words like f***** or insult other users using them. Of course being racist is a bannable offence but we should able to recognise if someone is being ironic, of course not heavily insulting the other one, but having a light hearted tone. And like Chaz suggested, you should generally be nice and not scare new users away.

The message wall belongs to the user and he should be able to do everything he wants there, of course using some common sense. For example, if someone doesn't want to respond to a user for certain reasons he should be able to close the thread for he should first say that he doesn't want to talk to the other person.

A GM should do whatever the hell he wants with his RP and if he does something stupid or be unreasonable, other users can just leave his RP. (Use some common sense guys.) Of course a GM can kick a person from his RP only with a reasoning which can either be discussed (preferable) or not depending on the GM. Of course it would be better to discuss it and you will be known as a generally better and more reasonable GM. There are and should be some general rules about OP and stuff by that which must generally be followed by the GM and RPers but the GM can change some stuff, of course based on the rules and as I said many times be reasonable and use some common sense.

Blog posts should be checked by staff and unreasonable posts should be deleted by them. Staff should mostly not participate in arguments, only civil debates. Brutal arguments should be closed immediately and those participating should be warned or even banned. The wikia must be at peace at all times!

There should definitely be some banning rules which also prevent arguments from happening. (Some people are tired of arguments...) Ban time should be written but it will also be dependant upon the staff to decide. But as people said, staff may be biased and that's normal so everything should be written which goes against my previous statement -i know that- and I don't know what to do now xD.

I like the new colors and I mostly like that they're dark, which is evil, so end of story. Racism under a lighter tone? Excuse me, but I'd sure as hell rather not open up a whole can of worms.

Is it not that if someone wants to ignore someone, it is unnecessary to close the thread itself?

Define unreasonable. Define arguments. Define brutal. Define peace.

Have any of you read the Rules? Specifically the section on banning.

The colours are annoying, especially since the text is hard to read if it's similar to the text (mine is annoying, but one can deal with it) like Tybereous', which I'd like to know who on Earth thought it would be a good idea? Oh yes, Tybereous, the guy I said wouldn't be effective. Oh, and Malta, I don't like that a small group makes all the law here. That's an oligarchy, which I hate almost as much as a dictatorship or an absolute monarchy. I don't make the rules, I didn't implement the system, so don't go moaning to me about it.