Thread:Auraestus/@comment-27097330-20160824163647/@comment-26347028-20160826224835

ChazmanianDevil wrote: Let me clarify, I believe that the privilege is the ability to ban and remove anyone and anything from your message wall. You lose this privilege by breaking wikia-wide rules. However our new rules act like you've already lost this privilege.

The word of the founder is yes, the most powerful on the wiki. However if he doesn't care, as Aurae has stated, I think it should be the majority who decides, not just you. So the Message Walls are designed to be lawless anarchy? Sounds like a great plan by Wikia without any flaws. Hey, let's allow anyone to remove and close messages without requiring anyone's consent. One thing, though. Banning is nowhere a privelidge. That's legitimised here, so the rules regarding banning from message walls are here to stay for one. As for removing messages, why should it not be regulated?

And am I saying that I should decide? Or am I saying that since it was implemented by a collective commanding Auraestus' position in his absence, it should take Auraestus' level of command to remove it. It is therefore up to him to put his choice up to a vote, not you.