Thread:Travian Sackett/@comment-26084195-20160710094227/@comment-28122306-20160710142030

Edacnik wrote:

Eureka Enderborn wrote: So, when you next get on here I imagine you're going to have some questions and/or issues regarding what has happened, so I am here to give you pre-emptive clarification.

Travian Sackett, you have been noticeably and clearly deliberately instigating.

You have admitted to your own bigotry.

But most damning of all, you have violated wiki policy regarding the abuse of multiple accounts.

As such, after deliberation with Auraestus, I have placed a stage-2 punishment on you. You have been blocked for 36 hours and will be on probation for a while. Eureka, you're usually the last to ban, and now you're the first? Now, you call him instigating, yet he's the one being harassed for his belief? He's instigating?

Admitted to his own bigotry? Are you so foolish, you don't know he's joking?

You don't even investigate his abuse of multiple accounts, as that is more often another user than the real user.

Auraestus said he doesn't even mind if someone has the Nazi sign as their username, yet you somehow convinced Auraestus that Travian is so bad?

Lastly, YOU argued against Travian's belief's which shows YOU are extremely baised in this.

But one more fact. I've noticed how you always want to side with Malta in RPs, are always defending her side, and always trying to validate her arguments, and guess what Malta wanted; Travian and Imrahil persecuted.

With this evidence, I am calling you out on:

1: Bais.

2: Favoritism of users.

3: Unfair banning; lack of evidence for ban reasons.

4: Bending the owner's will to your side.

This is just a part of the reason you're in the wrong. Hopefully you will reconsider, and if not, possibly I will convince Auraestus you're the one to be banned? Wait Hold up, Didn,t Tybereous said in chat that Eureka and Idom are the ones Responsible for banning people?