Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-25606723-20160529010222/@comment-25597877-20160529195652

Tybereous wrote: It is from the standpoint of benefit to society and species preservation, which was the turning point in previous arguments. It is way bigger than you mkae it. If it was a person you didn't know, would you push them in front of the train? From the point of being super general and valuing the whole rather than the parts, such as preserving the species then it is far more logical to let the greater number die. Every day we burn through recources, destroy habitats, and pollute the earth as a result of our overpopulation, so you tell me, what's better for the species, morality now and destruction later or a necessary evil for a peaceful future?