Thread:TheShade6/@comment-28122306-20160721173757/@comment-26347028-20160721180004

Tybereous wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: For purposefully causing trouble, and attempting to basically start a riot. The Riot Act would be a good read here, but I'm quite sure you've heard it many times by now. Nope. He was agreeing with me and my freinds about you, and therefore disagreeing with you. So you got rid of the annoyance.

Abuse, anyone? He was causing trouble with the intent of starting a riot. Whether or not he disagrees with me is of no consequence. If it was, I'd have done it much sooner, believe me.