Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-25356210-20151214232153/@comment-25975584-20151215003619

Argali1 wrote: The Indomitable wrote: Argali1 wrote: Aramirtheranger wrote:
 * Claps

Though, for me, "back in the old days" meant Arahad was still capable of single-handedly killing a FUCKING BALROG in twenty seconds... I was so bad then XD

But seriously, actual strategy ought to have a bigger role. Even if Thanatos is technically inferior to Galad, his(and by extension, my) ingenuity in combat should make them about equal. I acknowledge that Galad and Thanatos are equal. Hence them being nemesis's. Also, I am struggling to make my stuff balanced, but, I am really trying. BTW, I don't need anyone's "help", because I have a feeling that that is just going to be a bunch of mean spirited comments.

@Indomitable: If you manage to pass a law outlawing immortality, 'GOD. HELP. YOU.' Threats, so I see... If you have a hang-up about immortal characters, that is your problem, not ours. To force everyone else to conform to your rules is completely redicules, and, dare I say, fucked up. Immortality is part of Tolkien's lore, and you don't you dare get in the way of that. OPness is not, and by mortal I meant not deities, it could be Orcs, or Dwarves, or Elves, or Men, or others in positions of power, with some kind of weak, racially delineated magic that can't push others around, but is beneficial nonetheless. But, they have their races flaws, and as such, can be beaten in their own manner. A fear of a character dying would rein it in to a level that is reasonable, and prevent arguments about what is OP, because it will have clearly defined borders, instead of the clouded, flimsy ones we currently have...