Thread:Auraestus/@comment-27097330-20160824163647/@comment-26347028-20160826174643

ChazmanianDevil wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: ChazmanianDevil wrote: The problem comes with the rules regarding message walls. A message wall is like the personal space of the user. Hence why a regular user can remove comments and threads on it but nowhere else. A user can also not unfollow their message wall. A message wall, just like a profile page, belongs to a user. This means users have full jurisdiction over the message wall. However with the new rules, a user is unable to moderate their own message wall, or personal space. Users are not allowed to remove messages on their message walls, and instead are forced to keep getting the notifications. It's a violation of personal space. I won't name any names, for arugment's sake. I'll only say that this is the one, and right now only, part of the rules I don't think makes sense. While something should be said for harassment, and what it is, right now that isn't the issue. What is is unfair judgement by the people on what is apparently their own jurisdiction making it for all intents and purposes anarchical. Now, while, yes, something should be said for harassment currently that isn't a major concern. While comparitively the random banning and removal of messages is. As for saying you can't moderate it. You certainly can, within reason. A moderator can still moderate without banning everyone without reason, how is it any different here? It's abuse if a moderator does it, so why is this different? Sorry, didn't see this, I was responding to Aurae. The point is that a message wall is like a wiki house. It's personal property, and you can do what you want. And where do you get that idea from, hmm? Unfair dismissal, and things such as that, are rules for kicking people out of the workplace. The police cannot be brutal. The thing is, it's too much effort to try and police everyone's house, so they don't. It's not too much effort here, and so we do.