Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-27097330-20170224221935/@comment-27097330-20170319154226

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: ChazmanianDevil wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: Dragonbiscuit wrote: How about… no? We need rules that ensure no one does any things which could be considered annoying for the most part. It would be impossible to ensure people are nice, so we have to ensure that they can't be horrible. The second follows on from the first; if we cannot assure people aren't horrible with their abuse of power on their message walls, then the rules are failing, no? People can be jackasses on their message walls because it's just that. Their message wall. If people don't want to be there's they can leave. The only exception is certain levels of unacceptableness which are described in the rules. So they can't be jackasses on their walls, if there are "certain levels of unacceptableness". I just don't accept that there is any need to allow people to be idiotic, Chaz. There's a difference between being jackasses and being bigots, horrible people, directly attacking other members of the wiki, etc. Just someone closing your post on their wall without a reason does not qualify.
 * takes off tinfoil hat* Heart. I shall be blunt. What we're basically saying is. The rules need to make sure people are nice and respectful to each other, don't start arguments and in the case there are such they are nice and respectful. And finally. That GMs and people's walls have the freedom to run such the way they want.