Thread:High Prince Imrahil/@comment-26347028-20160706101420/@comment-26347028-20160707163409

Travian Sackett wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: High Prince Imrahil wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: High Prince Imrahil wrote: Eureka Enderborn wrote: No. It simply means that if you support a group you support everything they do unless they've negated it somehow. And I'm saying that's BS. You can support America but not wounded knee, you can support Britain but not murdering Joan of Arc... It's what the organisation stands for that matters. What has England stood for? Sure, at another time that. But it has changed. The Confederacy has not. But The Confederacy doesn't stand for slavery, that's merely a view coincidently held by some Confederates, as was stated by Lincoln himself in the previously mentioned Greeley letter. It stands for liberty and independence from The Union. It stood for nationalism, and, by transitive property, thus racism and thus slavery. That was a large part of it. By your own figures, 40% of people owned slaves. That's a massive number, and clearly that amount is shown through when you represent them with that hideous flag. Acually CSA census said less the 31% had slaves. I'm going by your own figures. I presume that went by families?