Thread:Auraestus/@comment-25356210-20161122205134

I would like to begin by saying that we failed. Another argument happen, though it was petty indeed.

Eureka has brought it to my attention that he thinks messages on a user's wall belong to the user who owns the wall the message is on.

Along with this, dealing with an older issue, apparently a user needs "a good reason" to close a thread on his wall, which means someone can passively harass or annoy another user and the victim can't close the thread.

Eureka has already taken upon himself to bureaucratically change the rules to fit his agenda.

Also, Malta thinks she has the right to edit the rules page.

Please, give your thoughts on this;

Who should have rights over messages on their wall, the wall's owner, or the thread-maker? Also, about the "good reason" rule on wall threads, should the owner of a wall be able to close it as he or she deem fitting? One more thing; does Eureka have complete tyrant-rule over the wiki when you're "gone", and should not we do something about users who don't have permission to change the rules? 