Thread:Tybereous/@comment-27097330-20160820190759/@comment-26453572-20160822145943

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: The Lord of Minas Morgul wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: The Lord of Minas Morgul wrote: Eureka Enderborn wrote: Actually, I'd reprimand her, but she hasn't done anything against the new rules, which is my present focus. So it is bias in that sense, I won't lie. She has, it's under 1c (which is a chat law, but Forum rules do include chat laws, as the page says), which describes disrespecting a user, and although Tybereous has said some things that could be deemed disrespectful in retaliation, you can't say Heart is exempt. I'd say Heart has chased after Tybereous more than enough today, and some sort of (fitting) punishment should be given to both, according to the rules. The punishment for such is a warning, which so far I haven't received. So yes, well done, you can't ban me for that. I thought a warning was for the first and hopefully only time? Here's another [example]. Yet it completely depends upon what you class as disrespect. I'm sure that someone such as Eureka would very much class Tybereous' abuse as far worse, and what I have done as insignificant. Because, well, it certainly is. What have I done? Spoken out against Tybereous in a way that pointed out that even when he was here he did very little. Now, remind me, is it against the rules to talk out against people you like now. Because, certainly, I don't see you telling Tybereous off for the clear abuse he pulled. Also, as a side note, minor offences do not in any way warrant banning someone from the wall. Hence, since he has tried that already, and his warning has been given, in theory he can no longer do it anyway for three days. Of course Eureke would, he's biased in your favor.

Actually, earlier I said Tybereous should also get some form of punishment. I'm going to talk to him elsewhere, where you two won't be around to bother us.