Thread:Eureka Enderborn/@comment-25356210-20161118202339/@comment-26084195-20161122203253

ChazmanianDevil wrote:

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

ChazmanianDevil wrote:

Eureka Enderborn wrote: First of all, Indom, take a hike. You are doing absolutely nothing but aggravating.

Another person's wall is their own space which you cannot simply do things on without their express permission. Also, Auraestus is gone right now. And what does that mean? Oh, yeah! I'm in charge. I'm his direct second in command as has been established numerous times. Now, admittedly, I thought this was just common sense. You don't remove things on other people's walls without their permission. End of story. I thought it was so blatantly obvious that it went without saying. But if I have to put it in writing, by golly I will. You do not control this wiki. You do not write the rules. I dispute your right to make the rules, and I dispute your right to interpret them. I dispute your ability to tell someone when they're getting out of hand, and your ability to decide everyone else's beliefs for them. Oh yeah, and I dispute your ability to say end of story and stamp out freedom of thought and speech. The day when you can do all those things is the day that I leave, forever. It doesn't matter who writes the rules, or who "makes" them. It matters who implements them. When someone is getting out of hand, it's quite clear, and it's quite clear when someone is wrong. He has every right to say "end of story", and as this is a private organisation you have no Freedom of Thought, Expression, or Speech. And even then, the exceptions to such freedoms are so large and up to interpretation it's silly. And considering, therefore, he physically can't do most of them, apparently you're never leaving. 1. Believe it or not it does matter who makes the rules.

2. He's not just implementing them, he's twisting them for no real reason.

3. Correct this is a private organization, but it is my belief, and more out people's that freedom of speech should extend in most places. This isn't a matter of legality this is a matter of ethics.

4. What interpretations? The way I see it, it means people can say what they want.

5. He has been doing those things. Just read this conversation. I deeply apologize if my attempts to make sure you lot actually conform to common sense is wounding your sensitive little ethics.