Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25597877-20160321220720/@comment-26863727-20160321225547

TheShade6 wrote: It doesn't work that way Ed, it would consist of nominees deemed responsible and not prone to arguments. I'm not saying whether you do or don't fit that criteria I'm just saying no volenteers There should be six members, five of certain groups and one unbiased(I nominate Shade), and there should be one person of each of the following groups


 * A (polite) Theist


 * A (polite) Atheist

(These are for anything vaguely involving religion, to balance each other out)


 * A (polite) Moderate


 * A (polite) faction owning player


 * A (polite) non-faction owning player


 * A (polite) unbiased person