Thread:High Prince Imrahil/@comment-27097330-20160921195630/@comment-27097330-20160922105440

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: Although there is a lot resting upon how you backed up the first statement, which isn't there. It's entirely possible you went much further than you say, and you wouldn't be directly lying except through omission. So, because of this, the statement is inconclusive anyway.

Heck, sure, it could be an overreaction. But from a guy who really isn't known for them? I think the likelihood of your involvement in his current absence is seeming more likely. And even more likely with those involved refusing to talk. He's mostly level-headed, but somewhat touchy about religion.