Board Thread:Roleplay Ideas/@comment-26295802-20160222014740/@comment-26347028-20160222191816

Edacnik wrote: A: No. The Wainriders were based of Mongolians which were the best riders history has seen.

B: Not true. Simply not true.

C: No, you get over the fact that Rhun is better than you think. Besides, who almost defeated Gondor in the early third age? Rhun.

D: Well, like you just implied, only certain aspects were true, and this is not one of them. A: "The Wainriders were a people, or confederacy, of Men from the East. They journeyed in great wagons, and their chieftains rode chariots in battle.[1] They camped in fortified camps of wagons. Their young women were also trained in arms, and they, along with old men and youths, stayed behind, able to defend their homes from attackers.[2]"

B: It very much is. You seem to think them if equaliing Knights. That would mean you have the same amount as Knights.

C: It's based off of the East, and I'm just stating facts about the East which is much worse than you think. Key word - almost. Even with Harad, Mordor, and Angmar, they failed.

D: You do not. I repeat, do not. Have plate armour unless there's something better for Knights to have. And there isn't, so you don't.