Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25606723-20160721141729/@comment-26347028-20160723020728

Dragonbiscuit wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

98.235.78.50 wrote: Hmmm i'm noticing a pattern. Heart is blamed. She says they're equally to blame... THEN Another user will agree with the previous user. it's almost like Heart is trying to technicallity and share blame her way out of this problem. It's almost like we need the wiki owner to say they're in charge. Tell her she can't do that, and if she does she'll be punished, no arguments no "trial". You broke the rules you get consequences no matter how much you have the ability to wriggle out. Just my suggestion. Y'know just a suggestion to go into temporary dictator mode when necessary. I personally suggest it. -Lord__Melkor/Dragonbiscuit was too lazy to log back into my account xD When the collective blame is all placed upon one person, it is only right that they dispute it. After all, I can't actually be punished as I've done nothing wrong. And, for the record, initiating Martial Law on the part of Auraestus would probably end in my release, not detention. What I am saying. Is that as the Owner of this Wiki. it is HIS wiki. So he could ban you for lols or me for lols. or anyone and everyone for his own amusement. I'm saying that due to how I run ToA. As in "I'm the Owner. I can do what I want deal with it" I try to avoid debating with Owners when it comes to me because I don't deal with debates on punishment with me.

You know, it really shows through just how stupid both you and your methods are. That system doesn't work, and never has.