Thread:Eureka Enderborn/@comment-25356210-20161118202339/@comment-26347028-20161121213618

ChazmanianDevil wrote: Eureka Enderborn wrote: Edacnik wrote: Alright, fine, that was a terrible example.

This is not quite property, these are messages on people's walls, that YOU put there. Posting a message on their wall is still an action done in their space. Should you not have the right to post a message on their wall? Do you have the right to throw things into people's property? Do you not have right to take an item back off someone's property that they willingly let you put there?

Everyone on this wiki is alright with removing and posting messages on people's walls. Dark Dwarves has taken messages off my wall. I've taken messages off others. Tyb has taken messages off mine. ''Everyone here does it. ''With this fact, I ask you a question; why do you harass me about it? This isn't a problem that the wiki has, it's a problem you have made personally against me and I find it quite rude you go out of your way to label me as a rule-breaker.

I will continue to remove messages off walls as long as wikia lets me. If you don't want me to, I will avoid removing my messages off your wall, but if you insist this is such a problem, talk to Aurasteus. No, Edacnik, no you won't, because I have explained to you numerous times in the past that you are not allowed to. If you continue to do so, I will be forced to take action against you. Which you have no right to do without consulting Auraestus, considering Edacnik has support on this. Stop acting like a dictator. You don't get to "take action" because of your intepretaiton of rules and you don't get to impulsively ban people either. As an admin it is your job to carry out the rules. If there is a dispute about the meaning of those rules that goes to Aurae, not you. Theoretically speaking, it depends upon what Auraestus wants to do. It's entirely possible Eureka is given the right to interpret the rules, or someone else is (or a group of people even). However, nowhere in the Rules does it say you can randomly delete messages, and since there are specified punishments for doing something like that at random, and it's not simply the one message being deleted (it's every single one), I think the rules are quite clear.