Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25597877-20160407121111/@comment-26347028-20160407200745

Patrick.vtap wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: Patrick.vtap wrote: This argument resulted from a post you made, what you yourself described as a "preventative measure". There are two sides to an argument. It takes more than one person, and thus technically we are both to blame. However, I was pointing something out amongst the document. There is a difference between speculation of a quote and attacking such speculation. Mainly because one is a personal attack, and the other less so - since they didn't actually say the words in a quote. So, instead of disagreeing (note the difference between disagreeing vs attacking), you say I should just not do so? And it was not an attack, it was just me having a different viewpoint. Holding your tongue in such a situation, or merely being a fair bit more civil in the attempt, would be better.