Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26295802-20161220024905/@comment-26210095-20161220233358

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

Patrick.vtap wrote:

High Prince Imrahil wrote:

Patrick.vtap wrote: So, in terms of bannable offenses, what are we thinking? An admin can't just decide 'that player's a menace to the wiki' and then BLAM! He's banned. Because the current Admin team is a bit limited and have their own biases, just like any human beings do. So, we need a list of ban-able offenses, how long the ban lasts, and how to decide. Exactly. Our current set of "rules" was thrown together with little-to-no input from the wiki at large. Hence the need to establish a real set of actual laws, not abunch of weird regulations that are only used on either the admins hate that day. So, shall we begin forumulating? How about you consider it as amendments to the Rules, not just rip them apart? So far as I can tell, you don't even know what they entail. Because we need new rules. I wouldn't be against implementing a major part of the rules in the new document, I just think we need something more acessible and that everyone works on and agrees on. Y