Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26295802-20161216171933/@comment-26347028-20161217183803

Dark dwarves 2 wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

Dark dwarves 2 wrote:

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

ChazmanianDevil wrote:

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: We have disparity already. Casual, or professional?

Now, I propose we create a body to fully design the reformation necessary, and then there could be a vote upon the parts that people are unhappy about? Doesn't really make sense to create a body, since the wiki's so small. There's like 12 active members anyway. Which still can't agree on anything. That is the main problem of the wiki is that a few of us can't agree with anything (Even if it is a good point) if some one they dislike is supporting the issue.

We all need to get over what ever grudges we have... we are (For the most part) young adults and need to get over acting like 5 year olds. We aren't acting like five year olds. This in itself is a real problem I keep seeing being said. We're being perfectly mature, we just have drastically different views. I would, however, say, that if a focus group can be created of those willing to do this, then it would be able to pool resources with fewer arguments.

Heck, perhaps a few different ones could be made for those with differing views, and everyone then votes when a certain few plans have been drawn up as to ascertain the best one (with STV if it's tied). I completely agreed. But I still believe that having different views shouldn't cloud views at all, that problem is what has brought this wiki down. Not the different opinions or views but people fighting over them.

Agreed. To an extent, everyone fights every day. So far as I'm concerned, it happens everywhere, and to compartmentalise it away is just making out the problem doesn't exist. However, if enough people believe a problem exists, and want to make a fuss, that itself is a problem (which, I would say, it currently is), which may be causing the "death" of this Wikia. So, I would be forced to agree with you in such a way.

Any idea as to how people are going to do this? I would suggest a deadline of, something like the beginning of February, and then everyone has to reveal their suggestions and they're voted upon (with a ban on "campaigning" as that'd just clog the wiki), and everyone just organises themselves?