Thread:Auraestus/@comment-27097330-20160824163647/@comment-26347028-20160826223803

ChazmanianDevil wrote: Well I believe it should be. Difference of opinion I guess.

The definition of abuse varies.

Good point, it is a privilege, and banning from a message wall only happens when you lose that privilege. But the rules right now act like someone's lost those privileges in the first place.

Auarae has already said he's neutral. That means it should come down to the people, not what you believe is right. The rules right now act as if you need to conform to a strict set of regulations so as not to lose that privelidge, to prevent the privelidge being abused. To lose the privelidge would be you not being able to remove, ban, close, etc. at all, which will happen if you abuse enough and get three strikes. But that's certainly not losing it from the get-go.

And if Auraestus wants to put it to a vote as to have it removed, he can. But it was placed there by Shade and Eureka, and upheld by them, so if he's indifferent it's not a majority to remove it, and if he wants to put his vote up for auction on a poll then he can, but who are you to tell him to?