Thread:Dark dwarves 2/@comment-26084195-20161212065854/@comment-26347028-20161217012206

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

Dark dwarves 2 wrote:

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

Dark dwarves 2 wrote:

Dark dwarves 2 wrote:

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

Dark dwarves 2 wrote:

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

Edacnik wrote:

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: This can be simplified to;

Eureka; "They're too powerful."

DD2; "But they have enemies, that don't exist for the most part." Dark Dwarves kindly asked you to leave, please leave. I am kindly refusing to leave if not supplied with a reason as to exclusion. It's not anything about the arguing it is just this thread is between me and eureka and I would like to keep it that way.... If you have your own issues by all means make your own threads. I'm open to opinions just not on this current thread. Thank you. And why is it suddenly only between you two? So far as I can see, before you even knew it existed, I had posted. I was off line that is no fault of mine. My life is not totally dedicated to this wiki. Because I have asked polity for it to be so, is there a problem in that? I am not specifying there is a problem with you not being online, I am specifying there is a problem with you trying to get rid of me from this thread.

So yes, there is a problem with that. It's nothing personal it is just this a thread between me and eureka.... once again nothing personal at all.

I don't know why your making a big deal out of it... atleast it seems that way. Exclusion is exclusion, and your excuses are petty. It's not a matter of exclusion. To be perfectly honest this thread has nothing to do without no matter what and I have kindly asked you to leave for a multitude of reasons, is it really that big on an issue that you continue to argue about it?

I have been given no reasonable explanation. The best you have come up with is that this is supposedly a conversation that I cannot partake in because it is between two people - yet, it clearly wasn't from the start, and even then, it isn't out of the question to actually allow someone to talk.

Yet, to try and exclude a specific person from a specific conversation is very much exclusion, and you have given naught but pettiness as reason.

Is it really such a big issue to admit fault?