Thread:Aramirtheranger/@comment-26084195-20161108221055/@comment-27168578-20161203155700

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

Morgoth the first dark lord wrote: I have some questions. 1) What happened with this thread? 2) If someone posts something in one's wall that starts an argument, won't the user be allowed to remove that thread? That actually would make more sense. 3) This is something for all of you, if someone you don't like posts something in your wall, you don't have to answer, you can just ignore him/her. That breaks no rules whatsoever and it will also prevent an argument. So why cause arguments out of something that can be prevented? I really have no clue...Maybe the ones that answer are willing to continue the argument... Here goes.

1. Just look at the "history" of the page. Next to quote, is "more". "History" is one the options. Press it on the very first message.

2. Unless it contains provable malice, no. If it contains questionable malice, it would be hard to force a punishment, however.

3. That's the point. But him removing the thread now causes basically a destruction of the evidence (eveyrything already said). 1. Of course I know about History, I just forgot to check that. (I know a bit of wikitext as i was the one fixing the templates and infoboxes [I can also improve the templates if someone wants me to])

2. I do think it should be removed if the user believes the thread tried to provoke an argument, of course with a bit of evidence but not totally clear malice needed to do that.

3. True but he has one standing point, that this thread is useless.