Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27097330-20170101033205/@comment-26347028-20170101044425

ChazmanianDevil wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: ChazmanianDevil wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: I don't agree with Imrahil as an admin. He's headstrong, a little arrogant, and fairly stupid.

Shade does far more than you'd be willing to believe.

He doesn't work terribly well as a moderator either in my opinion, but other than that I'd basically agree with moving Indom to mod.

We also really need an odd number of admins… He cares about the wiki, he's emotionally invested, and he's worked harder than anyone for reform.

I agree he definitely deserves a position in the staff, and my original idea had him as one of the two admins, but you have to admit he's often absent.

I think occasionally we need someone unbiased to tell us to shut the hell up and grow up.

Why? So one side can overrule the other? XD If need be Aurae can always solve ties, though I wasn't exactly suggesting an oligarchy of admins. Although the reforms so far have been terrible.

Absent, but far more capable than most other candidates.

An impossibility.

Yes, so stalemates can never be created. According to the current rules, which were never ratified and actually endorsed to be implemented by anyone other than Imrahil, it's highly necessary to have no stalemates. It may sound annoying to have one side overruling the other, but believe me, not having one side overrule the other is many times more infuriating.

It would be a possibility to give the moderators the swing vote, perhaps, or something, in such a case. XD Campaigning for more members on the wiki is terrible?

But absent nonetheless.

Not sure what you're referring to here.

I'm suggesting decisions not be made by admins only. That's not reform. Campaigning for something new is not reform. See the "re-" prefix? Something needs to be there to reform. We weren't exactly campaigning before.

And the best candidate nonetheless.

I'm referring to the need to break stalemates.

Then who? The populous is always a bad idea…