Thread:Auraestus/@comment-27097330-20160824163647/@comment-27097330-20160827151404

I thought you might bring this up actually, and here's the thing. Moderators have the powers for a different reason. The key is in the name, Moderator. Their job is to make sure things run smoothly on the wiki, that is why they have those powers. However, it isn't a regular user's job to make sure things run smoothly. As you've already said, it's no trouble for mods to do that. So why else would they have these powers except to use them?

My point is you said it was put in place by Shade and Eureka, and yet you said you had a conversation with Aurae to make it so. And if you had a conversation with Aurae at the time he was in the wiki, which means Shade and Eureka had no right to put the rules in place.

However much power they had at the time they made the rules, that power is now gone. In other words, any decisions they made at the time of their power lose the power after they have lost the power. And I'm not "randomly allocating myself to the position," only stating what makes sense. Think about this logically. Aurae makes the rules as founder. He has stated that he doesn't care, meaning he's neutral, so it must fall to someone else to decide this rule change. Who do you think this should be? The tiny group of admins? They have no more power over the rules than you or me. Yourself? That makes even less sense. The only logical thing is a community vote, something you clearly want to prevent.