Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25597877-20160407121111/@comment-27097330-20160409135702

Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: Patrick.vtap wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: Patrick.vtap wrote: This argument resulted from a post you made, what you yourself described as a "preventative measure". There are two sides to an argument. It takes more than one person, and thus technically we are both to blame. However, I was pointing something out amongst the document. There is a difference between speculation of a quote and attacking such speculation. Mainly because one is a personal attack, and the other less so - since they didn't actually say the words in a quote. So, instead of disagreeing (note the difference between disagreeing vs attacking), you say I should just not do so? And it was not an attack, it was just me having a different viewpoint. Holding your tongue in such a situation, or merely being a fair bit more civil in the attempt, would be better. Patrick was plenty civil, and no one should ever have to keep their viewpoint to themselves. You can't punish someone for disagreeing with you and stating that they do so.