Thread:TheShade6/@comment-26347028-20160820152715

TheShade6 wrote: The point is, while your comment may not have broken any wiki laws, and to you was a simple comparison. To many wiki members, Lomm, myself, and possibly tybereous himself, included: it was a jab, it was provoking Tybereous to unnecessary argument. So yes, Lomm was correct, but he was stooping to your level to call you out on it. Now, this being said, I want no more of this debate on this thread. If heart would like to continue, do so on my wall. Hey, I've got nothing better to do. A jab? Is something a jab if they've said it to your face and you're simply quoting them? Yes, sure, it wasn't required that I mention him by name, or anything like that, but merely quoting someone else does just about nothing, really. If I used the same sort of scenario, and was trying to, say, claim I wasn't a hero or something, "no matter what x would claim", then would that be classed as unnecessary? It's really simply harmless, and if the other person wants to jump on the situation and butt in then that's their choice. But, certainly, that is no provocation more than that. And, indeed, offering an opportunity for an opening is not viewed as provocation elsewhere, so why here? You don't tell girls to wear less revealing clothing, because that simply doesn't work. The problem remains. The same is true here, but in a different way. 